Thursday, March 06, 2008

Learning and Regret

There's a very interesting article in the latest Science where the authors designed an artificial neural net with regret to make it more accurately emulate human learning in an economic setting. This itself raises an interesting issue: the role of regret in learning. We feel immediate regret when we discover that we did something wrong. We reflect back on our choices and look at what we could have done. This allows us to learn more rapidly. (In a much earlier posting, I talk about how letting go of regret is freeing and psychologically healthy -- but in that instance, I was talking about holding on to regret, not the immediate, transitory feeling we get in this instance.) This makes a lot of sense, if you think about it. Suppose you have two students. Both miss the same question on a test. Student A looks at the test and shrugs his shoulder and goes "oh well." Student B looks at the test and regrets making a wrong answer, causing him to look at the question and his answer and to check what the right answer is. Do I really have to ask you which one of these students is learning? This suggests that we need to foster feelings of regret (in the immediate sense) in students if we want them to learn. Of course, we only regret if we care -- which perhaps only brings us back to the issue of how to make students care about learning in general -- including things they may not really be interested in learning. All of this nonsense about making learning "fun" is just that -- nonsense. The more fun we have made education in this country, the less our students seem to learn. So how do we get students to regret, in this healthy sense of the term?

4 comments:

John said...

We should encourage or compel students to reflect, both when they make mistakes and when they do things well. In my experience the simple question "Why did you do that?" and the ensuing red-faced silence as the student struggles to come up with an answer (I don't accept "I don't know" in most cases) is usually more effective than bribing, chiding, threatening, and nagging put together.

It's not that much of a stretch, because the constructivists are already all about reflective journalling and whatnot. The problem is that they're so reluctant to apply any kind of value judgement to work that's even remotely subjective that they'll accept just any old crap from students, who tend to complete such "reflective" assignments on the bus in the morning or at recess 10 minutes before they're due. I had a discussion with my grade 11's about the dual meaning of "self-consciousness" (everyone born in the last 40 years is familiar with the terminology of the "self-esteem" movement, but people rarely think about what it actually means) and how it's natural and healthy that self-reflection should be shameful, awkward and difficult sometimes and it went pretty well. I didn't get solid gold every time they handed their journals in, but their entries got more serious, interesting and sincere.

Troy Camplin said...

Perhaps such journaling should occur immediately after they get back a test or project or homework. Have them look the work over, give them a few minutes to think about the feedback, and then have them reflect. What do you think?

John said...

A good idea, but like any other idea in teaching it could go well or terribly depending on the students, the teacher, the time of year, or any number of other variables.

It would make sense to teach kids concrete strategies for self-reflection. Although self-reference is arguably the basic condition of the human mind, doing it consciously and critically requires at least some maturity and cognitive finesse.

There's probably a handy constructivist acronym out there somewhere.

John said...
This comment has been removed by the author.