In the latest issue of the Review of Austrian Economics, Nicolai Wenzel of Hillsdale College argues that Constutitions survive only when there is a strong constitutional culture. So long as the culture supports the constitution, one can expect the constitution of a particular country to be supported, the government to be stable, etc. But if the culture does not support it, then the government won't abide by it, and we get political and economic chaos.
This suggests a particular rhetorical strategy. It does little good to argue that something should not be done because the Constitution prohibits it if the person you are arguing with cares more about the issue than the Constitution. We see this all the time, especially among people in our government (which means they are violating their oaths of office, but, again, this only matters if there is a strong constutional culture). What we need to do instead is argue principles, and get more and more people to agree with those princples. If we can do that, people will apply those princples to specific issues.
For example, consider the principle of rule of law. Under the principle of rule of law, every person has to abide to the same laws, no matter who they are. This would include politicans and bureaucrats. Once you get people to agree with that, you then point out that we do in fact have laws that apply to the average citizen, but not to members (and former members) of the government. Why would legislators exclude themselves from a law? If a law is good enough for you and me, shouldn't it be good enough for them? From there, one can then move on to specific laws, if you want.
This suggests an entirely new approach to arguing for libertarians, including campaigning for Libertarians. If we want to be more successful and realize a freer future, we need to use rhetorical tactics that will work. It also puts particular importance on libertarian artists to produce great works (meaning, not vapid, polemical works) that contribute to the creation of a constitutional culture.
It is time we had an interdisciplinary world. It is time we created a society where all levels of thinking and society can work together – so the individual psychologies can live together in a more integrated society. Interdisciplinary thinking tries to promote environmentalism, capitalism, religion, heroic individualism, and families simultaneously. Beauty, truth, and ethics are united.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Monday, May 24, 2010
Relief, A Poem
Is that a crocus peeking through the snow?
The winter melts away around the bloom
Of tender promise in light indigo.
I'm thankful for the disappearing gloom.
The winter melts away around the bloom
Of tender promise in light indigo.
I'm thankful for the disappearing gloom.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Mario Rizzo on the Future of the Welfare State
Apparently Mario Rizzo at NYU agrees with me on the future of the welfare state.
Thursday, May 06, 2010
The Collapse of the Social Welfare State
In the same way the fall of European Communism began with Poland, it seems that the fall of European socialism is beginning with Greece. The social welfare state is inherently unsustainable. The problem right now is that the people of Greece are rioting to keep a system that is necessarily collapsing. The aftermath of that is likely to be an economic system that is less rather than more free, for Greece to move in the direction of communism and dictatorship. Of course, since Greece is a member of the EU, I cannot imagine that the EU will let them do that. I don't know what the EU has set up to deal with such a problem, but it seems that Greece is rapidly moving toward civil war. If it does, how can we prevent a wider war? And it looks more and more like Spain is not far behind Greece. And how many others?
In the meantime, our President and Congress are rapidly pushing the U.S. to being more like Greece and Spain. More debt, more social welfare programs that require higher taxes and more debt.
In the meantime, our President and Congress are rapidly pushing the U.S. to being more like Greece and Spain. More debt, more social welfare programs that require higher taxes and more debt.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)